Can you imagine the defense case to this O.P in a court of law?
In a court of law only certain evidence can be used as admisabe evidence.
This thread is all about inadmissible evidence, to refute the O.Ps claim.
John Mann "Judge ,content of court, declined" because " I object your honor this thread has yet to present evidence that refute the "O.P" ? Evidence which is the claim and all the evidence us believers need to believe"
The Judge ( confused by the above comment) replies " John" to clarify the O.P. requires:-
A) a scientifically proven answer?
B) answers of fact?
Case closed but thread continues...